Fountask Nanjing: Standings
Teams
Open
Seed | Name | Ranking Points | Pool | Qualified |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Amsterdam NED | 3,126,000 | Pool A | Ranking (Automatic Allocation) |
2 | Princeton USA | 2,266,960 | Pool B | Ranking (Automatic Allocation) |
3 | Gagarin RUS | 2,117,880 | Pool C | Lite Quest |
4 | Ralja Intglactic SRB | 1,626,240 | Pool D | Ranking (Automatic Allocation) |
5 | Delhi 3BL IND | 1,548,960 | Pool D | Ranking (Automatic Allocation) |
6 | Vrbas SRB | 1,388,240 | Pool C | Ranking (Automatic Allocation) |
7 | The Hague NED | 1,324,860 | Qualifying Draw A | Lite Quest |
8 | Beijing CHN | 1,244,000 | Pool B | Wildcard Host |
9 | Edmonton CAN | 1,118,400 | Pool A | Wildcard FIBA |
10 | Yekaterinburg Uralmash RUS | 840,920 | Pool C | Lite Quest |
11 | Chengdu CHN | 762,120 | Pool A | Wildcard Host |
12 | Changzhou KaidaGroup CHN | 749,400 | Qualifying Draw B | Wildcard Host |
13 | Shanghai SSLC CHN | 738,190 | Qualifying Draw B | Wildcard Host |
14 | Karatsu JPN | 253,493 | Qualifying Draw A | Wildcard FIBA |
15 | Jingjiang Yangtze CHN | 136,020 | Pool D | Wildcard Host |
16 | Venice Beach USA | 0 | Pool B | Wildcard FIBA |